Im dalej idę z lekturą tego dokumentu, tym bardziej jestem przerażony
Są tam dość kontrowersyjne zdania, które kompletnie kłócą się z tym, jak do tej pory grałem.
Na przykład:
"Editor's Note: It's actually impossible to tap a Ranger to satisfy River. This is because you must tap a Ranger in "a company that has moved to the site." The company has not successfully moved to the site until the site phase begins. Unfortunately, this is when the time limit for tapping a Ranger runs out."
Albo:
"Editor's Note: Yes, this also means that on-guard events cannot be revealed at tapped sites (unless affecting the auto-attack)! You can't say that a site is potentially going to tap when tapped unless there's a declared action that will untap it. See also MEBA 15, which can just as easily be read to say that on-guards require untapped sites."
Ten dokument ma jakieś oficjalne namaszczenie czy co? Czy to na zasadzie że sobie ktoś przysiadł i sklecił to z pierdyliarda innych tekstów?
